National character

The national character of a feudal language nation is intimately connected to the inbuilt switches of fears, phobias, paranoia, spilt and multiple personality and of social splitting, that are all encoded into that specific feudal language.

For example, in a nation like India, the feudalism in the languages has a special feature. The hierarchy or feudalism is not on a single line of precedence or hierarchy. Instead, varying attributes compete. In more plain words, it may be said that such things as age, financial acumen, job position, physical prowess, physical size, caste level, disposition for impoliteness and such things can all be factors that can place a person on the higher levels of the hierarchy. Basically it is enforced by a mean level of irascibility.

The idea is to suppress the other individual by basing the hierarchy to suit one’s requirement to reach the higher level. It is successful if the other individual concedes to that particular factor of hierarchy. For example, in most places, persons use financial acumen to enforce their superiority in language codes. However, the other individual may immediately try to take recourse by alluding to his superiority in age.

It is a very unsettling kind of equilibrium that is reached, which can tumble down the moment the props of the other factors of superiority goes down. For example, if the superiority has been enforced based on an individual’s financial stamina; and suddenly it is felt that it is a bit shaky. Immediately there is a resonance felt in the language code also. It gives rise to a very dangerous connection between individuals.

A lot of connected social emotions come into play due to this shaky nature of human relationships. For example, no one likes to see the prosperity of another person. He or she may go to many lengths to see if it is possible to neutralise any possible social or financial elevation in others who had been of equal social and financial standing.

Moreover, there is always the issue of not being efficient as a means of acting as a barrier to another person becoming efficient. For example, a deal has been made between two persons. Later it is felt that if one person among them does his or her part of the deal perfectly on time, the other may be able to perform fantastically. Then, a lot of others would come into the picture to dissuade the first person from doing his or her part of the deal correctly. For, if the second person is seen to be able to accomplish something great by just getting his or her setting correct, it can upset many persons’ indicant value positions.  

In India, even though there is a lot of hype on spirituality and compassion, the truth is that no one likes to see another person in a cosy situation. There is real delight in seeing another person in distress. No one likes to see another person rising up in social and financial standards, other than persons who are their own mentors. This evil mood, which is the real cause of the mess in the nation, is directly connected to the feudal languages here.

It is a very big theme, and currently I do not intend to discuss the various components here. A major part of it has already been discussed by me in my old book: March of the evil empires; English versus the feudal languages. Here I would like to deal with the issue of what would happen to a non-feudal language nation, when the nation is swarmed by persons of feudal language nativity.