The power of observation or visual input

Does mere seeing a thing change its features, attributes and future? Well, in the total of the writings in this book, I have mentioned the theme of seeing many times, and the way it does change the indicant word levels.

I open a page in my computer containing a lot of passwords and usernames. A casual observer happens to go through them. Does it mean anything to me and to him/her? Well, it depends on the observer. To a person who is totally unconnected to the things that are locked up inside the username password combination, it means nothing. However, to a person who is aware of the various things that I have made password access, it may mean a glorious input. It may literally mean the opening up and access to many things that I have made un-see-able to others.

In fact, the very seeing of the password page of mine has made changes in its status. Moreover both the observer as well as I has been affected.

Take another example: A young Indian-feudal language-speaking female (age 27), who is a senior officer in the Indian bureaucracy, that is an IAS officer, is having bath in a bathroom. Her senior aged peon (age 42) gets the opportunity to watch her bathe through a hole in the wall. What happens to her? Has she lost anything? In material terms, she has not lost anything. Yet, her body features have become encoded into the peon’s mind. Does it affect her in any ways? Well, for one thing, her female body devoid of clothing can in a grave manner reduce her to the levels of a young dismal, in the mind of the peon. The indicant level of a young girl is much lower than that of the senior bureaucrat.

The fact is that even such things as a camera can bring in changes into the material world, even though there is no way the person and entities in the scene can detect the camera. The affect it brings about depends on who is viewing the scene send by the camera. Beyond that, they can even edit and make other changes in the images and videos they have received.

Now, what I am contending here is that even the mere looking at a person by another can affect both of them. How, it depends. Now, the issue here is that if the social set up is feudal language, then the indicant level of the persons involved can have grave bearing on the total effect.

If a very lower indicant level person is able to view a superior indicant person, it does have its affects in a feudal language situation. For, the lower indicant person can look at the other person from a variety of angles and perspectives. He can look at the superior level person from a perspective of derision. In which case, the very manner in which the eyes are cast on the superior person can be of destabilising effect on the total personality of the superior person.

Here, I must mention that the description ‘superior’ is a relative word. It can mean superior in civility, politeness, knowledge and learning, social elevation and such. It need not necessarily mean superiority in wealth alone.

It is like a very low caste person viewing the young wife of his feudal lord. If the viewing is devoid of standard affectations of respect, then it can easily go into the levels of atrophying lechery, or of putrefying disrespect. The lower the lower caste person is, the more is the negative effect. In the virtual code arena, the young wife of the feudal landlord is being sent into abominable levels, from where her features and attributes can be subjected to more gruesome virtual code editing.

In many ways, the so-called reluctance to allow lower caste persons into the social and familial ambience of higher castes can be connected to this. Again, the culprit here is the feudal language codes that pour in colossal negativity in the virtual codes of certain sections of the population.

Now, I should go into another arena inside the virtual code. Visual inputs are basically codes. They do affect other codes. What about touching? Well, there is a code input for the person who does the touching as well as for the person who is being touched. Both get different kinds of code inputs, but then they are of a complimentary nature.

The emotions they produce in each of the persons depend on many things. Yet, a link has been established. If the person who has been touched loves the feelings, then it has an added effect. If the person who has touched loves the feeling, it is a complimentary effect, and there can be a powerful link established.

It is a similar situation with visual inputs. A beautiful young woman is being observed by a man. He gets visual inputs. The woman also gets some inputs of being observed. Well, a link has been established. The man loves the inputs he gets. The woman loves the inputs that she gets. Well, a relationship in the virtual code has been established.

Now, the real effect is how the different brain software processes the inputs. In feudal language software, the processing is quite powerful, for there is an array of positions to fit the inputs.

Now, if the woman is an employee of the observing man, then the visual codes that enter the observing person has a dominated mood. In the case of the woman, her brain may detect a powerful editing being done to her, by means of the powerful lower indicant word position that has been assigned to her and her visual inputs.

In every way, the codes of visual inputs are similar to touch inputs. The feelings are similar, and the emotional tie up could also be similar, if allowed. Even if not allowed, a link has been created. Even in English systems.

In many ways, this stands as a reason why in certain societies men do not want their women to be viewed by other men. For, there is an affect that the ordinary native English speaker cannot understand. It can be nullified, by making the experience a commonplace incident.