17 The continuous wobbling of the interlocked web elements

Now, there is one thing I had noticed with regard to my children as they grew up in a total English ambience. They showed no craving to stand in the middle of a group of friends. Standing in the middle is a very powerful scene in feudal languages. It very tangibly sends positive numerical inputs directly into the innate codes. It is a scene that makes corresponding changes in the codes connected to the social system. The very viewing of someone in a sort of leadership location adds numerical values to the code attributes of an individual.

A scene of a person standing on a side with no one to dominate around him or her subtracts the numerical values in the code attributes.

On many occasions, my children were trainers. They had no qualms about sitting in a chair among a group of trainees, with no wall behind them. However, in feudal languages, this is a very powerful propping required for a trainer. That of a wall or a tree or a mountain, just behind them.

If this is not there, it is more or less quite similar to not having the ‘respect’ word behind their name. They will literally go bent. Or fall ‘backwards’ into the gorge of ‘no-respect’.

Why this is so, might need to be found out from the language codes. As I mentioned earlier, feudal languages are totally different from English. They have codes which are different.

Actually each and every word might have a code level view of it. To talk about that requires this much introduction to it:

People see a website in a computer. They cannot edit or see its design or code view. They need a special software application for that. Most people do not know anything about that. And if they do know, many of them do not know what application can do that.

People see a pdf file in a computer. They do not know what software application can edit it. They do not know how to view the various codes or fields in their raw form. Some very specific software application is required to see it or to edit the pdf file.

An image is seen in the computer. To edit it, or to see its various other attributes, one might need an image editing application.

One can type words in MS Word. Create or edit an image in Adobe Photoshop. However, to go beyond that and see the various codes that create the Words in MS Word or the image in Adobe Photoshop, one might need to know how to use C++ and also have access to the various password securities encrypted into the application/s.

Think on similar lines.

There might be a supernatural software application wherein human languages and words and such other things can be viewed.

A person says in English: You come here.

If one can open this communication in that supernatural software application, and see the codes for You, and how it connects with the person who says it and the person who is addressed, one might see a very specific attributes in them.

View this scene in the design view.

After that, in the same Supernatural Software application, open a similar meaning communication in a feudal language.

It is again: You come here. However, there are various YOUs in the language, connecting to various levels of corresponding He, His, Him, She, Her, Hers, You, Your, Yours &c.

It is here that one might be able to see quite candidly that there is a huge difference in the Design view. In the feudal language Design view, the social scene is a very complicated one. With each and every man and woman existing in various levels of heights and lowliness. Beyond that, when each one of them converse with another persons, all the others are going up and down, even if the others are not directly connected to them in the conversation. For every one are connected by various YOUs, HEs, HISs, HIMs, SHEs &c.

If the physical life view of a planar-English society and that of a feudal language society are compared, it would be seen that in the feudal language society, even man and woman are incessantly moving in all sorts of directions, up and down, sideways, and to all other angles, when each person speaks, thinks or views others. However, by observing a miniscule location in the physical reality, one cannot see this astronomically huge random movement. To see that one might need special gadgets that can visualise the code level changes happening when each and every persons speaks or writes anything.

Actually there is a machine language which computers use and understand. I do not know much about it. However, it seems that binary codes are used in this.

Now, look at the binary codes for A and a. They are 01000001 and 01100001. These binary codes can be utilised only in a suitable programming location. In all other locations, they do not make any sense.

If one is able to open the word You (English) in a suitable supernatural software application, and finds its codes, it will have its very specific codes.

However, in Hindi, there are a minimum of three YOUs. Aap, Thum and Thoo. Each one of them, referring to a very specific level of individual or individuals.

In South Indian languages, the corresponding words for You are:

Thangal/Saar/Ungal;

Ningal/Neenga/Neevu;

and

Nee/Neenu.

(There are others also).

In German, the English word YOU splits into three. du, ihr and Sie.

Now, if one were to open each one of them in the afore-mentioned supernatural software, each one of these words would be seen to have a specific code version. Each of these codes would be quite different from the codes of other words for YOU.

Each of these YOUs will be connected to a specific group of other words.