MEIN KAMPF by Adolf Hitler - A demystification!

184. All who are not of good race in this world are chaff.

Actually this statement made by Adolf Hitler in connection to his ideas of racial mixing is correct, but not in the location that he has placed it in. I have noticed what had happened to the good quality at-home-in-English Anglo-Indians (not all Anglo-Indians). They were the mix of English and various bloodlines in the Indian subcontinent.

Being at home in English (some of them only), and command in quality English having a value in a nation that was being run on good-quality English systems, the soft qualities of the Anglo-Indians were valued. If their female were more sociable, it was accepted AS a superior level of human interaction. Moreover, they were not made to face the brunt of the lower indicant words for YOU, He, She etc.

However, the moment the clown in England, Clement Altee ditched the people in the Indian Subcontinent, everything changed. To the local rich who spoke in the vernacular languages, the Anglo-Indian refinement was simply understood as the meekness of the underclass. The indicant words for them literally sank to the gutters. They were now the lower indicant words in the feudal languages. Unless they were rich, themselves.

In fact, their affinity to use Mr., Mrs., Miss., etc. became the butt-ends of boisterous jokes. The women started being mentioned in words that could literally link them to wanton females and sluts. In a social environment wherein quality behaviour has no platform, they literally became dirt. The luckier ones among them were connected to the corporate sector, wherein their innate qualities were appreciated. Many escaped to English nations. Others sank to the social floors.

Indian film industry literally used themes related to Anglo-Indians as some sort of huge buffoonery. People who couldn’t understand the basic tenets of English the language, made films on Anglo-Indian themes, promoting the idea that their women folks were just being more socially daring without explaining the concept of such social liberties being encrypted in English the language.

As of now, I have deep fears that the native English-speakers of England might also end up in the same way that the Anglo-Indians have. Most of their innate behaviours would start looking quite quixotic or cocky. Anglo-Indians could escape to English nations. Where will the native-English escape to?

185. The greater the readiness to subordinate purely personal interests, the higher rises the ability to establish comprehensive communities.

Here again Adolf Hitler has been deep enough about the formation of communities. Each human community is designed as per the specific hierarchy and linking codes inside that community’s specific language. In feudal-language speaking communities, it is very difficult to promote a feeling of selflessness in people. Some persons would do it in a very contrived manner.

If such postures would attract ‘respect’ to him or her. Otherwise everyone is quite frankly aware of the need to be better off than others. In fact, another individual improving is a terror. For, the languages codes can act like a See-Saw. One man goes up, the other man goes down. Everything is relative.

It is not like pristine-ENGLISH. In pristine-ENGLISH one man going up does not make any relative or absolute change in the YOU, HE, HIM, HIS, SHE, HER, HERS etc.

186. This self-sacrificing will to give one’s personal labour and if necessary one’s own life for others is most strongly developed in the Aryan.

If by Aryans, Adolf Hitler means the Germans, he has still to show where the Germans are selfless and altruistic. This whole book Mein Kampf is full of themes that mention the common German as just next to a rascal, traitor and self-seeker.

187. In hardly any people in the world is the instinct of self-preservation developed more strongly than in the so-called ‘chosen.’

Here he means the Jews, off course. However, there is his query of how they became ‘Chosen’.

188. If a very genius from the twenties of the past century should suddenly leave his grave today, it would be harder for him even intellectually to find his way in the present era than for an average boy of fifteen today.

That might be true to only a very limited time period. It depends on who would try to guide the person through the great complicated webs of modern technology. If a typical feudal language speaker were to do this guiding, and if he or she finds that the old time genius would get to understand things very fast, then he or she would take him through a very roundabout routes that would mess up his understandings.

However, if it were a typical native-English person who does the guiding, in most probability, understanding the basics of the modern world would take only a couple of weeks.

189. Since the Jew-for reasons which will at once become apparent-was never in possession of a culture of his own

I sincerely do not know anything about the Jews. However, I have intrigued by the fact that the Jews were hated in many nations.

This is seen in the English classics also. And also in Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice. The exact reason for that might emerge if a candid study of their native language is done. It might be that they are a planar language speakers or would be that they are having a language that has codes which can terribly disturb others. Can’t say anything for sure without this basic information.

190. It is a noteworthy fact that the herd instinct leads to mutual support only as long as a common danger makes this seem useful or inevitable.

Quite interesting observation.

191. they would try to get ahead of one another in hate-filled struggle and exterminate one another,

If this is true, then the native Jewish language should be feudal of some variety. That needs to be checked.

192. Thus, the Jew lacks those qualities which distinguish the races that are creative and hence culturally blessed.

It does point to Adolf Hitler’s rabid antipathy for the Jews.

193. he is mostly found in the art which seems to require least original invention, the art of acting.

He has denigrated the art of acting to sort of mere mimicry. I should say that this couldn’t be true in the case of all actors.

194. Not through him does any progress of mankind occur, but in spite of him.

These are locations where Adolf Hitler does seem to be very rigid in his antipathy. I would like to condemn him for that. However doing so without prior information on the Jewish language codes and how it connects different people, may not be correct. I can’t be judgmental without information.

195. the conception arose that this was a people which should be reckoned among the ranks of the nomads.

No comment.

196. when the American continent was being opened up, numerous Aryans fought for their livelihood as trappers, hunters, etc

Again, Adolf Hitler is repeating a nonsense that has no basis, but it is a contention that can be used without the base.

197. wherever he appears, the host people dies out after a shorter or longer period.

It is mere anti-Jewish jingoism on which commenting without more information would be a useless task.

198. The Jew’s life as a parasite in the body of other nations and states

Though outwardly this statement does seem to be true, it would be quite an error of judgement to say anything without a proper understanding of the Jewish worldly experience. Could it be an issue of good people being in desperate situations or of vicious people being a nuisance for everyone? Current-day Israel literally feeds on US financial aid, that is what I hear.

199. The more intelligent the individual Jew is, the more he will succeed in this deception.

No comment.

200. Jew is really a Frenchman or an Englishman, a German or an Italian,

It is funny that Adolf Hitler did not mention that a Jew is an Chinese, Bangladeshi, Indian, Japanese, Pakistani, Cuban etc. Or is there a wider sense to be made out of it?

201. the Talmud is not a book to prepare a man for the hereafter, but only for a practical and profitable life in this world.

Don’t know. No comment.

202. when necessary he even took to the whip to drive from the temple of the Lord this adversary of all humanity

Adolf Hitler is mentioning Jesus Christ.

203. Among them is the lie with regard to the language of the Jew. For him it is not a means for expressing his thoughts, but a means for concealing them.

Now, we come upon mention of the language of the Jews. What was it? Was it Hebrew, Aramaic or Yiddish? Well, Adolf Hitler makes a very powerful mention: It is a language for not expressing his thoughts, but for concealing them. It is a very interesting observation, which need to be taken for deep study. If true, one will be able to find very specific word codes and very specific routes of usages that permit it. Languages are very powerful software codes or applications.

Indeed if one were to examine all ancient religious scriptures from this perspective, one might actually be able to come across the words codes that connect hymns and mantras to very powerful codes, that do not really connect to the literal meaning of the words and sentences.

204. but as soon as they became his slaves, they would all have to learn a universal language (Esperanto, for instance!), so that by this additional means the Jews could more easily dominate them!

Now we arrive at an error, or seeming error in Adolf Hitler’s words. There is a general talk that forcing an individual to learn a language is a means of enslaving him. Well, that is true in the case of feudal languages.

For instances, if the native-English children in any English nation can be coaxed or fooled to learn any such language as Mandarian, Japanese, Hindi, Tamil, Malayalam, Kannada etc., it can be the most powerful tool to mentally enslave them under the senior-in-age / senior-in-position, native speakers of Hindi, Tamil, Malayalam, Kannada etc.

For, the moment the English youngsters start speaking these language, the words that denigrate them would spring into action. If they can understand the words, they have no escape from its claws.

Now, this understanding is there in current-day India. So, the general talk here is that the English rulers forced the natives of the Indian peninsula to learn English to enslave them. The problem with this claim is that there was no force on anyone to learn English.

However, people who were exposed to English, quite easily understood that this was one language that could save them from enslavement. Most people in the subcontinent had no direct contact with English. They believe the information that English is an enslaving language.

They believe it when the Indian ruling class teaches them in their school textbooks that the English rulers forced the ‘Indians’ to learn English to enslave them.

Now, why does Adolf Hitler also make this same or similar claim? Well, is German a feudal language that can be used as a tool for enslavement? Or is the Jewish language/s also having similar codes? This is a very serious topic for investigation.