Hi everybody!

I sure can argue and answer word for word. Yet, that is not my purpose.

I am trying to convey an idea. That idea is not contained in my write-up: Language as a weapon. It was just a causal fringe theme, that language can have ferocious capacities. Yet, what I really meant was not like what Markus Antonus stirred up with his ‘Friends, Roman——‘like theme.

It was not about one person being eulogised and his consequent happiness and glowing mood. It was not about rudely insulting a person with such outburst as ‘You son of a bitch’ or even the old ‘You son of a gun’, and similar more sophisticated outbursts.

In an old English movie’ A passage to India’, I have seen a British officer barking at his Indian orderly (or coolie). Well, all these are not the theme I requested the reader to ponder on. (In India, there is no need for such an outburst; slaves need no chains; chains are encrypted in the language codes).

What I meant was of more a direct understanding of as a weapon. Like saying in a very pleasant and sweet voice, ‘You come and sit here’, and the other man literally getting axed down. Like a high power rifle with a silencer.

How can an Englishman understand this statement? There are very cunning manoeuvrings used in feudal languages, to outmanoeuvre another individual socially. The society literally exists as a continuing circus of manoeuvrings and out-manoeuvrings.

These things add up to only a minor part of my book; immense other features of feudal language affects are discussed. Yet, comprehensively speaking it is about the real codes in the feudal languages. Most of these codes are conspicuous by their absence in English.

These codes really act like viruses to communication.

In an old English movie’ A passage to India’ , I have seen a British officer barking at his Indian orderly (or coolie). Well, all these are not the theme I requested the reader to ponder on. (In India, there is no need for such an outburst; slaves need no chains; chains are encrypted in the language codes).

What I meant was of more a direct understanding of as a weapon. Like saying in a very pleasant and sweet voice, ‘You come and sit here’, and the other man literally getting axed down. Like a high power rifle with a silencer.

How can an Englishman understand this statement? There are very cunning manoeuvrings used in feudal languages, to outmanoeuvre another individual socially. The society literally exists as a continuing circus of manoeuvrings and out-manoeuvrings .

These things add up to only a minor part of my book; immense other features of feudal language affects are discussed. Yet, comprehensively speaking it is about the real codes in the feudal languages . Most of these codes are conspicuous by their absence in English.

These codes really act like viruses to communication.