When Britain stood by US in its moment, Britain only lived up to its reputation, of not being a turncoat. If, at the critical moment, seeing the tidal wave of sweeping opposition, had Blair turned pale and come stammering some excuses to ditch the US, then there would have been no difference between Britain and let us say France.

When English nations go for war, it is not like other nations do it; the whole crops of media men come along, and what kind of a fight can one do, with a whole lot of guys picking up each incident for philosophical debate. And, even though it has its positive sides, it can really bring a level of coldness on a nation’s determination.

There is need to have perseverance in anything, for nothing is achievable in a day’s time. And again, there is no need to pick on the WMD issue, for the war was definitely not fought for one single issue.

But again, what I would say is that there is definite lack of understanding of the international common man’s perception of events, and of the factors, which moulds it, among the English nations’ policy makers. The danger is in this area. And this lack of understanding may bring the English nations to many more areas of danger.

NOTE: Currently my opinion is that English nations should not go in for any war or any other interactions with other nations.